Tag Archive | "Clean Energy"

Californian bill aims to improve clean energy infrastructure.

The Governor of the State of California Jerry Brown has signed a wide-ranging bill aimed at improving the state’s clean energy infrastructure.

The Public/Natural Resources trailer bill came into law this week and Senate Bill 861 is designed to add impetus to the California state government’s pioneering energy storage initiatives, which extend down from utility-scale energy storage mandates to incentives for small- and medium-sized companies to deploy intelligent solutions.

The bill enables annual funding of $83 million of California’s Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP), allocating a total $415 million in state funds to assure its operation through 2019. Run by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), SGIP provides “rebates for qualifying distributed energy systems installed on the customer-side of the utility meter.”

In addition to wind turbines, waste heat-to-power systems, pressure reduction turbines, internal combustion engines, micro turbines and fuel cells, qualifying SGIP technologies also include advanced energy storage systems.

The SGIP now plays a key role in realizing the goals set out in California’s Assembly Bill 2514 (AB 2514), “landmark legislation that will create a smarter, cleaner electric grid, increase the use of renewable energy, save Californians money by avoiding costly new power plants, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and other harmful air pollutants through the use of energy storage technologies by utility companies.”

Whereas AB 2514 focuses on the energy storage at utility scale, SGIP is focused on fostering adoption of distributed energy systems, including intelligent energy storage solutions.

SGIP received more rebate requests for energy storage systems ($53 million or 34 percent of the total) than any other eligible distributed energy technology over the course of 2012, according to CPUC’s latest, publicly released SGIP Budget Review. SGIP requests for combined heat-and-power (CHP) fuel cells followed a close second with $52 million (33 percent of total SGIP requests).

Posted in Clean Tech, Renewable EnergyComments (0)

US EPA’s Clean Power Plan proposal to build clean energy economy

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has outlined guidelines for a new plan in an effort to cut carbon pollution from the existing power plants, making them more efficient and emitting less pollution, as part of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan.

The plan, known as Clean Power Plan, aims to reduce 30% of carbon pollution from the power sector by 2030 while ensuring a healthier environment, spur innovation and strengthen the economy.

EPA, by 2030, intends to reduce particle pollution, nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide by more than 25% as a co-benefit, and to cut electricity bills by approximately 8% by increasing energy efficiency while reducing electricity system demand.

Additionally, the EPA aims to avoid an estimated 150,000 fewer asthma attacks in children, up to 3,300 fewer heart attacks and several thousand fewer premature deaths due to pollution-related illnesses.

Calling the plan as a “common-sense approach” to reduce carbon emissions, Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz said that the plan will recognise the US’ key role in fight against climate change.

“A flexible approach will keep electricity affordable for American families and businesses, spark homegrown clean energy innovation that creates jobs, and increase energy efficiency to save families money,” Moniz said.

To be implemented through a state-federal partnership, the plan provides guidelines for states to develop schemes to meet state-specific goals to reduce carbon pollution.

The plan also provides flexibility for the states to choose the right mix of generation using diverse fuels, energy efficiency and demand-side management.

Based on this input, EPA will finalise standards next June following the schedule laid out in the June 2013 Presidential Memorandum.

Posted in Sustainable EnergyComments (0)

German Energy Reforms Could Spell Trouble for Small Renewable Energy Producers

BERLIN — There’s bad news in the pipeline for Germany’s small-scale producers of renewable energy, the backbone of the country’s heralded Energiewende, or clean-energy transition.

Germany’s Bundestag is currently in the midst of passing long-anticipated reforms of its landmark renewable energy laws. The center-right government of Angela Merkel claims that the measures are intended to “better control” the Energiewende.

The proposed legislation will revamp the 2000-enacted Renewable Energy Source Act, which paved the way for Germany’s boom in renewably generated electricity. According to experts and advocacy groups, one of the reform’s losers will be small and medium-sized producers who will now have to compete with much larger producers. “The needs of the citizen-run enterprises aren’t reflected in this bill,” says Rene Mono of Bündnis BürgerEnergie, an umbrella group representing small-scale renewable energy producers. Currently, small-scale producers, including 900 energy cooperatives, account for well over half of Germany’s renewable power, a development that upended Germany’s energy sector making it one of the most decentralized and largely community-driven in the world.

The problem, says the Merkel government, is that Germany is producing too much renewable energy too fast. In the first quarter of 2014, for example, renewables generated 27 percent of all electricity in Germany (almost all of this capacity added in the last decade). At noon on May 11 — a cloudless, windy day across Germany — 75 percent of Germany’s electricity stemmed from renewables.

Yet exactly this kind of unpredictable, open-ended surge, says Germany’s economics minister Sigmar Gabriel, who is responsible for energy policy, is the problem. Germany’s regulatory legislation must be reformed, he claims, because generation is racing ahead of grid expansion, consumer prices are rising too quickly, the power market is dysfunctional, and Germany’s EU neighbors are complaining about unwanted transit flows. Gabriel’s reforms are being strongly backed by Germany’s powerfulindustrial lobby.

Although there’s no consensus on the gravity of these problems (the Green Party, for example, says Merkel and Gabriel paint far too dark a picture), there’s general agreement that the laws must be updated to reflect a dramatically different energy market than that in 2000. The act’s reform was thus put at the top of the administration’s agenda and should be law by August of this year.

The central plank of the reform is the winding down of the feed-in-tariff, which will be phased out entirely by 2018 and replaced with a competitive-tendering, or bidding, system. In the name of cutting costs, the average incentive per kilowatt-hour will drop significantly for new installations built after 2014. Installations with more than 500 kW of capacity will not be eligible for any remuneration. This goes for projets larger than 250 kW in 2016 and then 100 kW in 2017.

The feed-in tariff will be replaced by competitive tendering (call for tenders, bidding). As of 2017 the government will auction off contracts for producers to generate set quantities of capacity.

The feed-in tariff, explains Dörte Ohlhorst, professor of environmental policy at the Free University Berlin, guaranteed producers fixed prices over 20 years. “This was — and still is — essential for giving small and medium-sized enterprises and citizens cooperatives investment security to invest and innovate,” she told REW. “The bidding system might be an instrument to control the renewable energy expansion rate but it will change the profile of producers in Germany. Small enterprises and citizens can’t take the risk of such a large investment without the kind of long-term security that the FIT provided.”

Even sources close to the government, who asked to be quoted anonymously, told REW that the tendering model has been a flop in other countries, like Sweden, Great Britain, and Netherlands, as a recent German TV documentary revealed. They say that this aspect of the reforms could well be revised at another point in the future.

Moreover, caps will be put on the different renewable energy sectors, prescribing quantities over which the feed-in tariff will no longer apply. This is meant to limit the over-stimulation of clean-energy production and make it more predictable for planning purposes, above all for grid expansion.  For example, solar PV and onshore wind will receive incentives for up to 2,500 MW of power a year. The cap is 100 MW for bio-energy and 6.5 GW for offshore wind until 2020 and 15 GW until 2030.

Another major change will be the gradual introduction of direct selling, aimed at facilitating the market integration of renewables. No longer will the grid operators be compelled by law to buy and then sell renewable energy on the exchanges in Leipzig and Paris. Rather, the producers themselves—first the larger producers and then over time smaller ones, too – will have to organize the marketing of their product themselves, usually done through commercial marketing companies.

Tobias Kurth of Energy Brainpool, a Berlin-based consulting firm, claims the direct selling measures will have only minimal impact on dysfunctions in the energy market, which is their intention, while they will hurt small and medium-sized producers. “It means higher risk and thus higher financing costs. The players in the market are going to have to have more capital to start with, which will change their profile.” The measures imply gradually moving from the flexible market premium model to a model based on a fixed market premium, he says.

Lastly, generation for self-consumption (producers who use their power rather than marketing it) must also pay at least part of the renewable energy surcharge, too. In the past, own-use generation was exempt from the surcharges generated by the feed-in tariff.

“Owners are forced into a marketing system with immense bureaucracy and increased risk for them,” argues Anna Leidreiter of the World Future Council. “It excludes energy cooperatives and private investors from the market.” While small producers and businesses will have to pay 50 percent of the surcharge, industrial companies will only pay 15 percent, even if they’re gas and coal-fired plants.

The presence of both of Germany’s biggest parties, the Christian Democrats and the Social Democrats, in the government imply that critique in the Bundestag is muted and that the reforms should go through without major changes.

The Greens, in opposition in the Bundestag, are clearly against the reforms, which they claim is an “attack on the Energiewende” that will neither lower prices nor ease the burden on consumers, but will benefit industry and fossil fuel suppliers including the coal industry. “The government pretends that the new laws won’t obstruct the Energiewende. But the opposite is the case,” says the Greens’ parliamentary group on its website. It claims that the caps mean that Germany will only increase renewable energy production enough to replace the nuclear capacity that will go off line in 2022.

Posted in Renewable EnergyComments (0)


Industry Video

Upcoming Events

  • No upcoming events
AEC v1.0.4

Newsletter Signup


The Magazine